Review: Paperlike, that $40 matte screen protector
If you're looking for a matte screen protector for your iPad, you may have seen the many Youtube video reviews for it.
Many of those Youtubers are sponsored by Paperlike. By sponsored, I mean they received free screen protectors, but may or may not be paid. There are so many sponsored videos that it's actually difficult to find reviews made by people who spent their own money to buy that US $40 screen protector.
So each time I see a Youtube creator push Paperlike to their audience, I sigh.
Why would you guys want to push a $40 matte screen protector to your audience? Just because you received them for free? Seriously?
I receive sponsored products all the time to make reviews. So what's the difference? The difference is I will tell you whether or not the product is actually worth your money.
I personally won't recommend people get a screen protector that cost more than US $15 to $20. Sure some are better but no matter how good it is, it's not worth spending more than $20 for just a screen protector.
Paperlike actually contacted me asking if they could send some free screen protectors. I said no. And then I went on to buy them myself. I spent $40 for two pieces of screen protectors.
The shipping took way longer than I expected so I emailed them to ask what's wrong, and they actually sent out another set of screen protectors to me in case my original order was lost in transit.
These are things included with the order.
You get two pieces of matte screen protectors, a thank-you postcard, wet wipes, micro fiber cleaning cloth and some stickers to help with installing the screen protector.
My previous matte screen protector was SuperShieldz which I bought on Amazon two years ago for US $14. For that price, I received three pieces of screen protector. I messed up two installation but the third one was successful.
That screen protector lasted me two years until it developed scratches.
These are the installation tools. Some helper stickers to help align the screen protector to the glass display, other stickers are for removing dust particles.
There's a Paperlike installation video made by the company that's actually quite useful. If you're using a screen protector from another brand, you can still watch the video to learn, just replace helper stickers with your own clear tape.
Here's how SuperShieldz looked on my iPad Pro.
And this is how Paperlike looks. There's no visible difference, but the Paperlike has slightly more texture so when you run your fingers on it, you can heard a more audible feedback.
Here's how the anti-glare looked on SuperShieldz.
And this is how Paperlike's anti-glare looks.
Because Paperlike has slightly more texture, that matte texture will diffuse more light, and hence will diffuse reflections more. You can see with SuperShieldz's anti-glare, you can still sort of see my window grills.
The difference in the effect of the anti-glare is actually not significant in real life usage. When you're using both matte screen protectors in an environment with bright lights, both anti-glare will diffuse light to create the white haze which will affect the colours, contrast and details of what you can see.
That's how Paperlike looks in a well lit outdoor environment.
And that's how it looks when view straight on with the display at 100% brightness.
Note that I was under shade and there's no direct sunlight falling on the display. However, due to the bright outdoor environment, the anti-glare will diffuse light and create that white haze across the whole screen which visibly impacts the image quality. This is what you'll get with SuperShieldz as well. Only clear glass will give you the best colours and contrast. That anti-glare is why some people don't like matte screen protectors.
When you're working indoors, the anti-glare will only diffuse reflections so the white haze created affects a portion and not the whole screen protector.
It's only when you're viewing the display from the front, indoors, without reflections that you'll get the best image quality.
Can you tell the difference between the two screen protectors based on the two photos above? I can't, not from the photos and not in real life.
All matte screen protectors will introduce visual artifacts, colour noise, or speckled effect to the display. Even matte surface IPS LCD monitors have that effect but not as noticeable compared to matte screen protector. Paperlike and SuperShieldz seem to have same amount of colour noise.
When compared to SuperShieldz, Paperlike offers a slightly more tactile drawing experience. It's a subtle difference that you can only appreciate when you have two screen protectors side by side to compare.
One good thing I like about screen protectors is they don't pick up fingerprints that easily, and even if there are fingerprint smudges, they are quite easy to wipe off compared to wiping a glossy display.
Conclusion
There's no significant visible difference with Paperlike vs SuperShieldz.
In terms of drawing performance, Paperlike has slightly more texture. However, I can't say that Paperlike is better. It's more accurate to say that Paperlike is different.
There has to be something special with that screen protector if you want to charge $40 for it. After using it for a few days, it's just a matte screen protector.
I don't have the heart to recommend a US $40 screen protector to anyone when I know that there are so many other matte screen protectors selling at way more affordable prices. It's a good matte screen protector, yes, but it's just not worth that amount of money, certainly not more than twice of other brands available.
As mentioned earlier in the review, I don't recommend people spend more than US $15 - $20 for a screen protector. And I still stand by that.
Comments
Thanks for the honest review.
Thanks for the honest review. I've ummed and ahhed about Paperlike. While I'd like a screen protector, the $40 price mark felt a bit much. Plus it was a lot to spend if I didn't like the texture.
Never heard of Supershieldz, but will take a look at them.
Ive ordered these paperlike
Ive ordered these paperlike protectors several times, and in the interest of full disclosure, they were kind enough to send me extra ones when I reordered my second time.
I like them- the ipad screen for me gets tacky and probably due to my own poor technique, the side of my hand starts, stops, and skips over the screen and its difficult to get a natural smooth line- but with the paperlike it glides right across. Im used to a cintiq and the smoothness of the ipad screen was also a major factor that I wanted to overcome so I went with the one that was marketed as paperlike- well its not paperlike and its not quite the texture of my wacom but its good enough. $40 is steep but I use it everyday and until I find something better Ill keep ordering em.
I bought the older version a
I bought the older version a while back after watching many reviews comparing it favourably to paper. It is nothing like paper - unsurprising as no screen protector is genuinely paper like (unless anyone knows differently). It's a decent screen protector like so many others. Not worth the high price.
It's been a long time, but I
It's been a long time, but I think Rob Sketcherman recommended it because he thought it gave a feeling more like drawing on paper. When I use the Apple Pencil on the screen, it feels too smooth.
@Andrew Brewer
In reply to I bought the older version a by Andrew Brewer (not verified)
@Andrew Brewer
Making the matte surface behave exactly like paper is possible. But that surface will be much rougher, will diffuse light more and will affect colours and contrast even more. There has to be a trade off or compromise somewhere.
@Kate Buike
In reply to It's been a long time, but I by Kate Buike (not verified)
@Kate Buike
Rob Sketcherman likes Paperlike. But it's still not worth spending US $40 for that.
What matte finish textured
In reply to I bought the older version a by Andrew Brewer (not verified)
What matte finish textured protector do you recommend?
These are $20 per protector (you get 2 for 40). I use my iPad 40 hours a week or more so for me it’s pennies a day at most - in fact I wouldn’t have a problem paying even more money for a nice textured screen if you have any you can recommend. Thanks for your suggestion
@Ian Scott Berry
In reply to What matte finish textured by Ian Scott Berry (not verified)
@Ian Scott Berry
Paperlike to me is just another matte screen protector. Compared to SuperShieldz which I was previously using, Paperlike has slightly more texture when drawing, noticeably more texture when you're running your finger on it.
However as mentioned in the review, I can't say that Paperlike is better. Different is a more accurate description.
In terms of value for money, I will personally still go with SuperShieldz. You get 3 pieces for less than US $10, and it's not as if it's lousy quality. I used that for two years until I had scratches. And I enjoy using that, except when using it outdoors where the anti-glare really affected the image quality – same problem with Paperlike.
You may want to search Amazon for another brand called Elecom. From what I've read, there are two types of matte screen protectors from Elecom. The smoother one, probably like SuperShieldz but still matte. And the rougher one, maybe it's like Paperlike. I've not used Elecom before so I can't say for sure. Maybe check Youtube for reviews too.
Appreciate your time and
In reply to @Ian Scott Berry by Teoh Yi Chie
Appreciate your time and recommendation Parka!
I'll check out Elecom and also check back here to see if the readers have any textured screen protector recommendations of their own.
Cheers
I had both the paperlike and
I had both the paperlike and the Elecom "bond" screen protectors. The Elecom bond is a lot more paperlike than the original paperlike, would recommend people who are into paper texture to give it a spin. It is available on Lazada. Still more expensive than the average matte screen protector, but probably still half the price. I actually like scrolling with my finger with it, more tactile. :)
Great tip! Thanks Winnie!!
In reply to I had both the paperlike and by Winnie (not verified)
Great tip! Thanks Winnie!!
Thanks for this review. It
Thanks for this review. It gave me peace of mind ordering the cheaper Supershieldz in a situation where shipping would add exorbitantly.
Thanks for the recommendation
Thanks for the recommendation. I think 40$ is bit too much. I'm using screen protector from Gadgetshieldz, which is actually a liquid screen protector and costs just 17$. The quality of the screen protector is really great for that price, provides immense protection against scratches too!!
I bought paperlike in March.
I bought paperlike in March. My efforts to apply two screens did not work well – was left with a lot of snow flacks- although it was a bit better in the second attempt.