Artist Review: Canon LiDE 400 flatbed scanner

The Canon LiDE 400 is the new flatbed scanner that replaces the LiDE 220 that was released years ago. All the scanners I've used in the last few years were the LiDE scanners from Canon. They perform well and are affordable, which is why I use them.


In addition to the LiDE 400, there's also the LiDE 300. The LiDE 300 is cheaper and has fewer document scanning features. In terms of image quality, you can expect them to be similar so if you're on a budget, you can consider the LiDE 300 over the LiDE 400.


The LiDE 400 uses a USB Type C to Type A cable while the LiDE 300 uses the typical USB Type A to mini USB. Canon's documentation says that the LiDE 400 cable cannot be used for other purposes but you most certainly can. That cable can be used to charge phones and transfer files. And if the cable is damaged or lost, you can get a replacement easily.


The new design is a bit blockish. I love the texture on the cover.

My review will be from the artist perspective so I'm not going to talk much about the document scanning features. In the photo above, those shortcut buttons are for scanning documents. There's the ability to create PDFs automatically, scan and email, scan and save to cloud, auto scan with auto crop and rotate and more. These shortcut buttons have auto-correction applied to the scans so the scans will be alter to look "nicer".


A detachable stand is included so that the scanner can be propped up and use less space on the table. I prefer laying the scanner flat on the table because I want to press down on the paper or sketchbook to get a proper scan.

This scanner uses Contact Image Sensor (CIS) technology for scanner. This means whatever you are scanner should be in contact with the glass surface. If the paper is just 1mm off, the scan will be blur.


This scanner can only scan up to a maximum size of A4. If you need to scan larger, you will have to scan multiple times and do the stitching yourself. There's auto-stitching functionality in the driver, but there's some auto-correction applied too.

If you scan large often, consider the Epson 12000XL-GA which is priced US $2000 and upwards. Unfortunately, high quality A3 art scanners are rare, and Canon doesn't make them.


The lid can be raised to scan thick books.


Here's an example of a scan. This scanner can capture whatever it's scanning accurately.

By the way, you can download the high resolution scans I've made by clicking on the pictures.


This was scanned using the scanner driver's ScanGear feature which allows you to scan without any auto-correction and edits. Note that the scanner was able to capture the texture of the watercolour paper.


This was scanned with the Auto-Scan feature. Note that the paper texture has been "erased".

To scan artworks, you should use the ScanGear feature from the driver. ScanGear is only available on Windows driver. For Mac users, to scan without auto-correction, use Image Capture instead. Image Capture comes pre-installed with Mac OS. Just do a search for it.


One area where the scanner may have issues is when scanning off white paper. Shown above is paper that is off white, creamy. But the scanner still does a good job scanning it as it is. ScanGear did not apply auto-White Balance to make the paper white.


Here, I tried to scan a A4 spiral sketchbook. With the spiral, the whole sketchbook is actually larger than the A4 scanning area of the scanner. Hence some parts of the paper are off the surface, more specifically, I wasn't able to get the bottom part to fit in.


The bottom part appears blur because it wasn't in contact with the glass. So to scan something like this, I would need to scan twice and stitch.

Misalignment problem


Someone contacted me and told me this Canon scanner and some scanners from other brands have this misalignment problem that can be seen when you scan in high resolution and zoom in close. You've got to scan at at least 1200 DPI for you to have enough detail to zoom in to see for yourself.

In the 2400 DPI scan above, I was able to spot the misalignment at different spots on the scan. The misalignment runs on the long side (the length not the width). It's difficult to spot at 100% zoom which was why I failed to spot this problem in the first place. When you zoom in several times, you can definitely see the misalignment. It's like the scanner missed a few vertical lines of pixels while scanning.

So is this a problem? Depends. If you're using the scanner to archive art or prints where you need the accuracy, then this scanner may not be up to that standard.

Nowadays I scan at 600 DPI for my artworks and it's really difficult to spot so it's not really a problem for me. I can also scan at higher resolution and downsample the scan later and that would remove much of the misalignment to the extent they are not noticeable even when printed.

But of course it sucks to have this misalignment problem in the first place.

Scanning speed

The scanning speed for 300 DPI is quite fast. It's around 8 to 10s. At 600 DPI, the speed drops to slightly more than 30s.

When it's scanning fast, it's loud. If you use the scanner in the office, your colleagues nearby will be able to hear you. If you scan at 600 DPI which slows the speed, it's significantly more quiet.

The Canon LiDE 400 can scan up to a maximum resolution of 4800 DPI. LiDE 300 scans up to 2400 DPI.

To scan at the maximum resolution, you have to do it through ScanGear. When you open ScanGear and look at the resolution drop down menu, you will see that there's no 4800 listed among the option. Well, you just have to type in the numbers yourself. The driver will also show you how large that file size is going to be. For a 4800 DPI scan at A4 size, the file size is 6.4GB.

Conclusion

The Canon LiDE 400 is a fantastic scanner for scanning artworks. It's able to capture scans accurately. Price is not too high so overall, it's really worth the money.

If you already have the previous LiDE 220, there's no need to upgrade since the image quality is similar. And if you have limited budget, the LiDE has similar image quality as well.

Availability

Check more out reviews on Amazon via the direct product (affiliate) links below.

Canon LiDE 400
Amazon.com | Amazon.ca | Amazon.co.uk | Amazon.de | Amazon.fr | Amazon.it | Amazon.es | Amazon.com.au | Amazon.co.jp

Canon LiDE 300
Amazon.com | Amazon.ca | Amazon.co.uk | Amazon.de | Amazon.fr | Amazon.it | Amazon.es | Amazon.com.au

Tags: 

68 Comments

The stitching app ArcSoft

The stitching app ArcSoft Scan-n-Stitch Deluxe(windows only) from Epson seems to be more flexible(output size and number of input scans) and automatic(alignment) than Canon’s IJ Scan Utility Lite(according to the following links), but IJ Scan Utility Lite looks more convenient on most normal other functions than Epson Scan 2(macOS)

I have a V19, considering if it's worth switching to a LiDE 400 because of the software(I use Mac OS mostly), can you share more details about the software give that you have both? Thanks!

Hello,

Hello,
The misalignment error you are seeing is most likely not a fault of the scanner, but rather than a lot of common graphics viewers. It is an interpolation artifact and is not actually visible in the image.
Try using a reputable graphics viewer like irfanview, the line will be gone.
I noticed this with a lot of browser viewers and the default Windows 10 Graphics Viewer.

Daniel,

Daniel,
I'm having the exact same problem with warm colors! I got my scanner on the weekend and I noticed it doesn't capture yellows and oranges (I have a MacBook pro). I read about Color Matching, but that option is only available on Scan Gear. I came to the blog to ask if there was maybe a workaround that.
I hope we find a solution soon.

Hello, Luisa. I finally got a

Hello, Luisa. I finally got a new scanner, Epson Perfection V39, and although it's working better, it struggles to capture brilliant colors. So, in the end, I still have to manually adjust colors of the image to match the original. I guess all these low-range scanners suffer from the same issue. I haven't tested high-end scanners. I hope that helps. Best regards.

Hi Daniel, I'd like to ask if

Hi Daniel, I'd like to ask if the problem had been solved with the product change.
I also have a problem with scanning orange pigments, which appear red on the scans. Mixed oranges (red and yellow pigments) are okay.
I ask this because I wonder if it is a general problem or not. Can I hope to solve the problem with return the product and change for a new one?
Thanks.

Hello, Szilvia. As far as I

Hello, Szilvia. As far as I know, changing the product for a new one won't solve the issue. I changed the model completely (returned the CanoScan and got an Epson). Anyway, the Epson also get some brilliant colors wrong. I suppose that, if you want accuracy, you'll have to get a high-end pricey scanner (or edit the image and adjust hue and color balance per channel on Photoshop). I hope that heps. Best.

I have two questions

I have two questions regarding this scanner.
How fast is scanning an A4 document at 1200 dpi? I couldn't find anything in the documentation. There is a "
line speed", but I don't think that simple multiplication would do, so if you still own the scanner, can you say how fast is it.
The other and more important for me is :
Is there a "scan border" with this scanner? Most scanners that I used, have a scan border - If you put the A4 sheet exactly in the corner of the scanner, there are 1-2 mm of the image that are missing from the scanned file. And this is bad if you are scanning photos or pictures, where there is something meaningful on the edge.

Pages

Add new comment