I would like to give Jake the benefit of the doubt but after watching the video it's way too similar. Anyone that has tried to teach and find an original way to teach a concept knows how much time and effort it takes to collect those thoughts and present them in a simple way. Jake or his ghost writer took the quick route and just copied Alphonso. It's not the techniques or tools that are the red herring. It's the overall collected presentation of thoughts. There are so many ways to teach, yet almost every page is a carbon copy of Alphonsos book. The clincher to me was the page that showed the value scales that use 2 values, then 3, then 6 values. That is such an arbitrary way to break up values. Why would they be exactly the same? Why would every page be almost the same? The overall content of each book is way too similar and anyone that has tried to teach will know it.
I would like to give Jake the benefit of the doubt but after watching the video it's way too similar. Anyone that has tried to teach and find an original way to teach a concept knows how much time and effort it takes to collect those thoughts and present them in a simple way. Jake or his ghost writer took the quick route and just copied Alphonso. It's not the techniques or tools that are the red herring. It's the overall collected presentation of thoughts. There are so many ways to teach, yet almost every page is a carbon copy of Alphonsos book. The clincher to me was the page that showed the value scales that use 2 values, then 3, then 6 values. That is such an arbitrary way to break up values. Why would they be exactly the same? Why would every page be almost the same? The overall content of each book is way too similar and anyone that has tried to teach will know it.